Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambush near Kaçanik
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ambush near Kaçanik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An ambush resulting in a single fatality which isn't otherwise notable for its impact on the wider conflict of which it was a part doesn't meet the criteria set out by WP:NOTABILITY, WP:LASTING and WP:SUSTAINED. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Yugoslavia. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Kosovo. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. There is no evidence of notability. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom: non-notable with only local/semi-local long-term impacts. Cheers. Last1in (talk) 18:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom lacks notability.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.